🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for using excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.